Specification Quality Checklist: DeepEval Metrics Integration¶
Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning Created: 2025-01-30 Feature: spec.md
Content Quality¶
- No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
- Focused on user value and business needs
- Written for non-technical stakeholders
- All mandatory sections completed
Requirement Completeness¶
- No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
- Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- Success criteria are measurable
- Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
- All acceptance scenarios are defined
- Edge cases are identified
- Scope is clearly bounded
- Dependencies and assumptions identified
Feature Readiness¶
- All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- User scenarios cover primary flows
- Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- No implementation details leak into specification
Notes¶
- All items pass validation
- Specification is ready for clarification or implementation planning
- Key scope boundaries:
- DeepEval integration for multi-provider support (OpenAI, Azure, Anthropic, Ollama)
- G-Eval for custom criteria evaluation
- RAG metrics (Faithfulness, ContextualRelevancy, ContextualPrecision, ContextualRecall)
- Azure AI evaluator provider validation enhancement
- Assumptions documented regarding DeepEval version and provider API availability