Specification Quality Checklist: Eval Runs, Prompt Versioning, and Test View Dashboard

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning Created: 2026-04-18 Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

• No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
• Note: python-frontmatter and Streamlit are named because they were explicit user-driven scope decisions captured under Clarifications and Assumptions; they are not prescriptions of internal implementation.
• Focused on user value and business needs
• Written for non-technical stakeholders
• All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

• No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
• Requirements are testable and unambiguous
• Success criteria are measurable
• Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
• All acceptance scenarios are defined
• Edge cases are identified
• Scope is clearly bounded
• Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

• All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
• User scenarios cover primary flows
• Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
• No implementation details leak into specification

Notes

• Items marked incomplete require spec updates before clarification or implementation planning
• The mention of python-frontmatter and Streamlit in FR-010 / FR-022 reflects user-confirmed scope (Q3, Q5) and is intentionally retained so downstream planning agents do not relitigate the choice; the internal HoloDeck implementation patterns remain unspecified and belong in plan.md.